Now Seriously, folks: what are the odds that one group of 4 parties would each receive 12,895 votes nationwide (Jerry Litzel, Jeff Boss, Randall Terry, and Merlin Miller), while each candidate of THREE “Reform” parties got precisely 4,704 votes nationwide (Andre Barnett, Chuck Baldwin & Barbara Washer), one pair of faintly familiar names (Jill Reed and Richard Duncan, both running as “independents”) got – 12,032 – 0.01%, while an utterly unknown pair (Sheila Tittle and Peta Lindsay) each received 2,470 exactly.
As with the precise variance between Exit Polls and Actual Results in the election of 2004, the stochastic probabilities (statistically estimated odds) of these set of numbers lining up so precisely, of such exact coincidences happening in reality are about the same as the odds of a previously unknown meteor or comet hitting YOUR house—tomorrow.
Below, please see the unofficial, final vote totals for the 2012 Presidential General Election as tabulated by Google—not famously owned by the Obama administration, but who knows????
With more than 95% of the vote reported, percentages will most-likely remain the same for the final official count. But the actual vote totals may increase slightly—or maybe they won’t…..?
2012 Presidential General Election final vote (with 95% of precincts reported) – from Google Elections:
-Barack Obama (Democratic Party) – 60,786,989 – 50.4%
-Mitt Romney (Republican Party) – 57,890,120 – 48%
-Gary Johnson (Libertarian Party) – 1,139,562 – 0.9%
-Jill Stein (Green Party) – 396,684 – 0.3%
-Virgil Goode (Constitution Party) – 108,195 – 0.09%
-Roseanne Barr (Peace & Freedom Party) – 49,426 – 0.04%
-Rocky Anderson (Justice Party) – 34,521 – 0.03%
-Tom Hoefling (America’s Party) – 28,099 – 0.02%
-Jerry Litzel (independent) – 12,895 – 0.01%
-Jeff Boss (independent) – 12,895 – 0.01%
-Randall Terry (independent) – 12,895 – 0.01%
-Merlin Miller (American Third Position Party) – 12,895 – 0.01% (Tied for 15th)
-Jill Reed (independent) – 12,032 – 0.01%
-Richard Duncan (independent) – 12,032 – 0.01%
-none of the above – 5,753 – 0%
-Andre Barnett (Reform Party) – 4,704 – 0%
-Chuck Baldwin (Reform Party) – 4,704 – 0%
-Barbara Washer (Reform Party) – 4,704 – 0%
-Tom Stevens (Objectivist Party) – 4,001 – 0%
-Stewart Alexander (Socialist Party) – 3,897 – 0%
-Will Christensen (independent) – 3,553 – 0%
-James Harris (Socialist Workers Party) – 3,427 – 0%
-Jim Carlson (Grassroots Party) – 3,169 – 0%
-Sheila Tittle (independent) – 2,470 – 0%
-Peta Lindsay (Party for Socialism & Liberation) – 2,470 – 0%
-Gloria La Riva (Party for Socialism & Liberation) – 1,518 – 0%
-Jerry White (Socialist Equality Party) – 1,126 – 0%
-Dean Morstad (independent) – 1,107 – 0%
-Jack Fellure (Prohibition Party) – 503 – 0%
NOTE: It is highly irregular that so many of the actual vote totals are the exact same. You might want to monitor the Google Election site, as well as others, and will update the above numbers accordingly. Also, as write-in ballots are eventually counted and added in, the above totals should rise slightly.
And in case you’re wondering—YES, the implication of these data are that, if they got lazy and just fudged the extremely outlying minor third party candidates by assigning them the same numbers, well, YES, as a matter of fact this probably suggests that in the election of 2012, our votes were, for the most part, never really counted at all….
The evidence has been accumulating for a very long time that U.S. Elections are fraudulent. In regard to the 2004 election, I wrote a comment published on Salon.com:
There is some very compelling evidence that the 2004 election was rigged, and it’s the statistical analysis of the exit polls. I noticed this discrepancy on election day, but a very respected series of statisticians have all concluded that the likelihood of all the exit-polls being wrong in precisely the same way is 1 in a million, about the same as earth being struck by a previously unidentified meteor—tomorrow. The website showing these very sound studies is:
http://www.donotconcede.com/Dataexitpolls.html and I defy anybody to say that these studies are not scientifically valid. Somebody was tampering with the results of the 2004 election. Somebody has turned the United States government into a secretive and tyrannical enemy of the peace and prosperity of people worldwide (notice that I said “of people”—somebody obviously likes every “person” whose name ends in “Inc.”). I feel quite certain that the same “somebody” is involved at all levels—and that “somebody” is either the Bush-Cheney-Rove triumvirate or the “invisible hand” that moves them all and keeps them in power when they should be….elsewhere.
I urge everyone interested in the topic to read the above website and:
Scientific Analysis Suggests Presidential Vote Counts May Have Been Altered
Group of University Professors Urges Investigation of 2004 Election
Officially, President Bush won November’s election by 2.5%, yet exit polls showed Kerry winning by 3%. According to a report to be released today by a group of university statisticians, the odds of a discrepancy this large between the national exit poll and election results happening by accident are close to 1 in a million.
In other words, by random chance alone, it could not have happened. But it did.
Two alternatives remain. Either something was wrong with the exit polling, or something was wrong with the vote count.