Tag Archives: Women attracted to Obama

OK, OLD GOSSIP RESURFACES AGAIN: IS BARACK OBAMA GAY? I mean, it would be kind of perfect if he were: “A Half-Black, Fully Gay, Totally Dishonest Communist in the White House”—just the recipe for the end of the world as we know it….so why don’t we feel fine?

I have to say, when I was working with Orly I certainly heard all this stuff about Obama being gay and I was never very impressed.  Larry Sinclair was supposed to come to a hearing in Fort Lauderdale to testify on my behalf against Orly but he didn’t show up even though I had offered to pay his expenses, so I never met the man even though he apparently came and went from Orly’s presence literally while I was working in her office.   I confess that if Obama turns out to be gay it will give me a certain amount of pleasure to know it just because I could never comprehend why women found him so attractive except that some women seem to be attracted to any thin man with a dark tan (I’m a rather pasty and not particularly thin man myself, so I consider this a problem—I have commented before I DO get sick of the current “Vogue” in Los Angeles that White girls almost have to have AT LEAST one Black boyfriend to be considered even remotely cool…YUCK!  DISGUSTING!  VILE!  Sometimes I just HATE the modern world and the way people conform to style and fashion as a decisive factor in their lives….).

The Following is from the blog: “http://justnotsaid.blogspot.com/2012/09/is-obama-gay.html

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Is Obama gay?

When I first heard a few days ago that Obama might be gay, my initial reaction was, that’s ridiculous. He’s married, has two kids, and he’s never set off my gaydar. I had read a few years ago about Larry Sinclair, who claimed he had given Obama oral sex when Obama was a state senator. But at the time I just figured that any famous person is bound to attract a few loonies who will say anything to get publicity.

But after I read the article linked two posts ago (and directly below), I started reading more about Obama’s gayness, and after a while, it just made too much sense not to be true.

In his article in WND.com, Jerome Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D. in political science, said that Obama (along with Rahm Emanuel) was a lifetime member of Man’s Country, a gay bathhouse in Chicago. Obama was evidently well known there and many of the older clientele remembered him:

Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, who worked with the National Security Agency from 1984 to 1988 as a Navy intelligence analyst, confirmed DuJan’s claims.

“It is common knowledge in the Chicago gay community that Obama actively visited the gay bars and bathhouses in Chicago while he was an Illinois state senator,” Madsen told WND.

Obama’s reputation in gay circles, by the way, was that he liked to receive oral sex but not to give it, which squares with what Larry Sinclair had said about him. (It’s his “signature.” And receiving blow jobs but not giving them would be consistent with Obama’s narcissistic personality.)

As a member of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity Baptist Church, Obama was known to have a close friendship with Donald Young, the openly gay choir director of the church. Young was murdered execution-style on December 23, 2007, just as Obama began his climb toward the Presidency. Another gay member of the church, Larry Bland, had also been killed execution-style a month earlier. Both cases remain unsolved. Donald Young’s mother believes to this day that he was killed in order to silence him.

Jerome Corsi is dismissed by the Left as a “Tea Party activist and conspiracy theorist.” But even if you regard Corsi and Madsen and Dujan with suspicion, what they say fits the larger picture of Obama’s life far better than a heterosexual narrative would. The circumstantial evidence — away from his public image as a family man — fits the homosexual narrative perfectly.

There is virtually no record of Obama having had any girlfriends before he married Michelle at age 28. He referred to two in his autobiography, but these were later revealed to be “composites.”Are we to believe that a healthy sports-oriented young black man had no record of having chased after girls during his youth? You’d think that after he’d first been elected as President, when he was seen in such a messianic light, all sorts of women would have come forward claiming past flings. But none did.

In his autobiography, Obama stated that during his years at Columbia he spent all his time in the library and “lived like a monk.” But if he spent all of his time in the library, he should have gotten excellent grades, especially given how smart he is supposed to be. Then why spend a million dollars hiring 11 lawyers to make sure his academic records were permanently sealed? It’s also hard to believe that a young man who by his own admission freely imbibed drugs was otherwise inclined to live like a monk.

Another question: how many successful black men marry women far darker than themselves? If successful black men do marry black, it’s often a woman so light-skinned you have to look twice to ascertain her blackness. This tends to be true of successful blacks in business, in entertainment, and in sports. Obama wasn’t rich when he married Michelle, but he was a Harvard Law School graduate and did give the impression of an ambitious young man on his way up. And politically ambitious young gay men care more about beards than desirable females.

Michelle, in turn, married Barack out of ambition. She reportedly had divorce papers drawn up after he lost an election to Bobby Rush for a House seat in 2000.

When Barack was first elected President, Michelle wanted to stay in Chicago and raise their two girls there. She was quickly informed that this would not look good, so she moved to the White House.

Has a President’s “body man” ever been given such prominence? Part of Reggie Love’s job as Obama’s personal valet was to “wake the President up in the morning.” (How could he do this without waking Michelle up at the same time?) Love reportedly worked up to 18 hours a day, “often sleeping on the burgundy couch.”

The “body man” before Love was Nick Colvin, who left the White House after rumors surfaced that he had had sexual relations with Obama while Obama was a state senator. (Obama hasn’t had just one Clyde Tolson, he’s had two.)

And why all the snickering when Kal Penn (“Kumar” of Harold and Kumar fame, widely known to be gay in Hollywood) was working in the White House as the President’s Associate director in the White House Office of Public Engagement? Google “Kal Penn Obama affair” and you’ll get 165,000 results.

The ways in which Obama tries to compensate are telling too. His jaunty stride up to the podium is meant to project virility; and his vocal delivery, with that faux vaguely-black accent, is meant to show manliness as well. I’ve seen other gay guys who try too hard to appear manly, with overly emphatic movements, and it usually leaves the opposite impression.
You never, ever hear any whispers about Obama and women. Sure, there are stories about power struggles between Michelle and other women, like Oprah Winfrey and Desiree Rogers; but no stories about Barack straying with other women. I had always just assumed that this was because he was a squeaky clean family man who was perhaps a little scared of Michelle. But for a healthy man who ascended to the Presidency at age 48, who had star power and unlimited access to women, to never, ever indulge? That would be practically unheard of. But no, there will be no Monicas for Barack.
Obama has essentially been hiding his sexuality in plain sight all this time. In retrospect, I’m astonished at my own blindness. (There has been chatter about his sexuality on the internet for years.) But he just never set off my gaydar. And after all, he is the President of the United States, which is not a position we generally associate with gayness, any more than, say, Army General.
In a way, it’s almost racist not to see Obama’s gayness. Sometimes it’s hard to see past the blackness: we do have a tendency to assume all black males are high testosterone potential rapists.

Obama also has none of the sheepishness, or sense of furtiveness that we sometimes associate with gays. But maybe he doesn’t give off that vibe because his narcissism overrides any possible sense of embarrassment.

I want to emphasize, there’s nothing immoral about being gay; it’s something you either are or you aren’t, and you have no choice in the matter. But with Obama, his duplicity about his sexuality is reflective of his duplicity about practically everything else. He has employed Alinsky-ite methods to hide his gayness the same way he has employed them to hide his far left political leanings.

At this point, more than three years into Obama’s Presidency, his sexuality has to be open secret in Washington. The White House press certainly knew about JFK’s escapades with women at the time, but kept them quiet. They are undoubtedly performing a similar function with Obama.

(By the way, if you don’t believe that Obama is gay, go ahead and laugh at me. But the truth should become much more widely known after Obama has left the Presidency, when the press no longer has a reason to protect him.)

You have to wonder whose idea of a joke it was when Newsweek put out that famous cover of him with the multicolored halo over his head and titled it, “The first gay President.” (In fact, Obama is the second; James Buchanan was almost undoubtedly gay as well.)

I can’t help but wonder what effect would it have on the upcoming election if Obama’s homosexuality became more widely known. And while I don’t blame Obama’s for his sexuality, I do hold it against him that he’s such a con man and narcissist. He’s also obviously out of his depth as President, and his rigidly leftist mindset precludes any realistic ideas about how to kickstart the economy, or even of how the world works, for that matter.

But there are many people who wouldn’t vote for Obama simply because he is a homosexual. So I do hope this becomes more widely known in the next seven weeks.
If you see this post, please pass it on. (Click on the headline of this post, then copy the address and email that.) Thank you.

10 comments:

Anonymous said…

John–All I can say is wow! The question for me now is, is he actually gay or could he simply be androgens, as some people are? Plus, how could I have been so duped as well. Great article! Brian

September 18, 2012 9:22 AM
Baloo said…
Yes, this needs to be passed around everywhere. It’s partly quoted and linked here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2012/09/obama-metro-or-homo-or-both.html

September 18, 2012 10:22 AM
John Craig said…
Thank you Brian. My opinion, he’s gay. Please pass the post along.

September 18, 2012 11:31 AM
John Craig said…
Baloo –
Thank you, as always.

September 18, 2012 11:33 AM
taylor said…

Everything about Obama’s past seems very shady… Have you seen ‘2016’? I don’t recall any posts about it…

Whatever the case, I think D’Souza is sort of stretching the truth to fit his argument, but I still find Obama’s history very strange. I usually do not care much about the personal aspects of a candidate- just what they’ve done professionally and what they promise to do. For those reasons I already did not like him- now I am very suspicious of his history. Hiding his grades, possible homosexuality, strange family history, association with socialists and anti-colonialists, weird political dealings in Chicago. All put together it’s pretty bizarre he’s President, AND no one (the press) has ever addressed it.

What do you think?

p.s. I’ll share the link, but it will be lost on college liberals etc..

September 18, 2012 5:37 PM
John Craig said…

Taylor –
No, haven’t seen “2016.”

There’s no question there are a lot of gaps in Obama’s history. He was part of a corrupt machine in Chicago. The Rezko connection. His disjointed family history. His flaky mother. And while you can’t hold Obama responsible for his weird family, we have to ask what he’s hiding about his college years. No President in history has ever had his college records sealed like that. What is Obama hiding? At first I thought it was just that he wanted to hide the extent to which he was a beneficiary of affirmative action — and I am dying to see his SAT and LSAT scores — but now I think it’s something darker.

Thanks for passing this along.

September 18, 2012 6:48 PM
WJGBalderama said…
Could he be bi-sexual?

September 18, 2012 11:13 PM
Anonymous said…

The trip to Pakistan was what convinced me. I suspect he went there to participate in some young boy love without any chance of repercussions. But John! You miss the danger here. If Obama is gay he is subject to blackmail, and THAT is a national security nightmare.

September 19, 2012 12:43 AM
FUBO said…

“I want to emphasize, there’s nothing immoral about being gay; it’s something you either are or you aren’t, and you have no choice in the matter.”

(and oh yeah, Obama’s a flamer – you only “didn’t notice” because you wanted him in there to sodomize America for you.

September 19, 2012 12:49 AM
John Craig said…

WJGBalderama –
I don’t think he’s bi, all the rumors are about men.

Anon –
I have to think that his homosexuality is such an open secret within his administration by this point that he’s actually not that much at risk for blackmail. And there’s been chatter on the internet about it for quite a while (I’m evidently a little late to the party here). But for the average voter to realize he’s gay, the mainstream media have to say it (and not just metaphorically, as Newsweek did), and no mainstream media publication is about to do that, whether or not a blackmailer informs them.

FUBO –
What I always tell people who think homosexuality is a choice is, could you just will yourself into wanting to suck penises if you wanted to? No? Then it’s not a choice.

I didn’t vote for Obama in ’08, by the way, because by then it was already obvious that despite his post-partisan, post-racial rhetoric, he was a committed far leftist. (And wanted to sodomize the country, in your words.)

September 19, 2012 5:07 AM