The US Army Blinked


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMAND

1 RESERVE WAY

ST. LOUIS, MO 63132-5200

AHRC-PLM-S 14 JUL 2009

ORDERS A-06-916551R

COOK STEFAN FREDERICK EAD8 MAJ EN 000 00 0000

W096AA

THE FOLLOWING ORDER IS REVOKED OR RESCINDED AS SHOWN.

ACTION: REVOKE

SO MUCH OF: FORMAT 162 A-06-916551 AHRC DATED 09 JUN 2009

 

PERTAINING TO: EXTENDED ACTIVE DUTY ORDER OF

COOK STEFAN FREDERICK

000 00 0000 MAJ EN 21B

FOR ARMY USE: AUTHORITY: 10 USC 12301 (D)

ACCT CLAS: 21 9/0 2010.0000 01-1100 P1A1000 11**/12** VFRE F3203 5570 01FFGU 12161 21 9 2020.0000 B1 B1TC 135197 21T1/21T2 COO7803T916551 VFRE F4209 AZTD2E 12161 CIC: 2920B1AZTD12161 9199-STL-18JUL09

 

FORMAT: 705

************** LOUIS B. WINGATE
* AHRC * COL, FA

* OFFICIAL * COMMANDING

**************

DISTRIBUTION: 1 SOLDIER

1 SOC CENTRAL (SOCJ1) 7115 S BDRY BLVD 813-828-6378 MACDILL AFB FL 33621

1 USA ELM HQ USSOUTHCOM 3511 NW 91ST AVENUE MIAMI FL 33172

One response to “The US Army Blinked

  1. Maj. Cook won personally, but it is a calculated concession by the military. They avoided a court decision which would establish a precedent for other military personnel who want orders issued through a legitimate chain of command, that is, one headed by a lawful, Constitutionally eligible, Commander-in-Chief.

    Without regard to the legitimacy of the CinC, or even if there were no CinC, the military must independently maintain its internal authority and its ability to issue orders. In other words, the CinC is not the identity of the military, and the military is more than an agent of the CinC; it exists in its own right. And that’s a good thing.

    It would have been hard for the military attorneys to claim that Maj. Stefan Cook did not have standing to bring suit, especially since he was the defendant. :^P

    It is widely known throughout Europe and Africa that Kenyan-born Barack Obama is not a lawful U.S. President. Therefore, it would have been impossible to claim as specious Maj. Cook’s argument, that the Geneva Convention would not protect him if he were captured.

    In this case in the U.S. District Court in Columbus, Georgia, are the three notorious, “devil’s advocate” law firms involved?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s