Before Dr. Orly Taitz and I parted company on November 4, 2009, we were discussing the possibility of filing a Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto in the District of Columbia. There are many reasons why such a Petition should be tried, but laying the groundwork for invalidating Barack Obama’s actions as President is the primary one. The proposed Copenhagen climate accords and treaty could well be, as Lord Monckton and many others have suggested, the death knell of national identity and freedom in America, and with America goes the rest of the world. As a good friend writes from Texas,
America is a nation of Koolaid drinking fools and morons. Republicans rejected Ron Paul and the Constitution. That tells me that the GOP base is just as delusional as the Democratic base. Americans consistently vote away their liberty to any socialist or statist, regardless of political party. They are so morally and intellectually weak that they have totally succumbed to enslavement and a police state. At least Obama is waking up the living dead. In that respect, his election was a wake-up call for those among us who even care.
I don’t know about the “Koolaid drinking” element of this generalization, but it is very true that the slide into ignominy is moving very quickly in this Country. I support anyone who is willing to pursue quo warranto in rational, carefully thought out, and well-planned constitutional litigation. The writ of quo warranto in the hands of the people is or should be, as the papers drafted in Barnett v. Obama advocated, critical to the maintenance of democracy in the United States. Dr. Orly Taitz has shown that she is unwilling and unable to do what is necessary. Who will stand up to the plate and hit the ball? Plaintiffs’ Sur-Reply 10-01-09; Flast v Cohen Doc 69 Response to Motion to Dismiss 09-21-09.doc”