One Massachusetts Copperhead’s Views on the Civil Rights Record and Legacy of the Sixteenth President (Please Note: as a matter of family history more “Lincolns” fought for the CSA than the USA in 1861-65)

Once before I sent a letter to Bill O'Reilly...
Valerie Protopapas 2:51pm Sep 25
Once before I sent a letter to Bill O’Reilly (he had compared the Confederacy with Nazi Germany). The other night he held up Lincoln as the type of leader we need in this country. Since he won’t read anything I send him and since this letter applies to other neo-cons like Mark Lavin and Glenn Beci, I figured I would “send it out into the ether and see how far it went. Here is my open letter to Bill O’Reilly:

<An Open Letter to Bill O’Reilly

Dear Sir:

Obviously, you are not a stupid man but sadly, your intellect seems non-existent when it comes to your judgment about American leaders. You have stood foursquare against the current socialist trends in the federal government. You have condemned the excesses of Congress and the Administration and the ever growing centralization of power in Washington as well as the trashing of the Constitution. You have mentioned time and again that such excesses are diametric to the founding principles of the nation, flying in the face of that same document—and I have applauded you for your public defense of those republican (with a lower-case “r”) principles and the men (and women) who have championed them.

Yet, the other evening, I heard you—yet again—claim that the “gold standard” of American leadership was none other than President Abraham Lincoln. I actually became so enraged I turned off the TV! I could not bear to listen any longer. All that we currently endure we do so because of Abraham Lincoln! It was Lincoln who embraced the movement of power away from the Sovereign States and the People as envisioned by the Founders. It was Lincoln who adopted the socialist/communist ideologies brought into the United States from Europe with the arrival of the so-called “48ers,” the mostly German followers of Marx fleeing their failed revolutions in Europe. However, it is also true that Lincoln had adopted those same policies independently before he was influenced by Europe’s socialist upheaval. Did you know that Marx adored Lincoln for the very reason that he worked to centralize power in the federal government? And did you know that Lincoln’s government and military was filled with Marxists and socialists? It was Lincoln who abandoned all constitutionally imposed restrictions on the federal government and the presidency when he planned and initiated war against states performing an act guaranteed to them in the Constitution—that of secession from a union that was no longer in the best interest of their people. It was Lincoln who deliberately and with malice brought that war to fruition—a war that cost over a million lives both military and civilian and destroyed an entire section of what had been the united (lower-case “u”) States for a century or more. And the list goes on and on. There is no more infamous lie in the annals of American history than Lincoln’s analysis of the causes of the so-called “Civil War”—“…and war came.” War didn’t “come,” Lincoln brought it into existence in what proved to be a successful attempt to prevent the loss of eleven Southern states and the 75% of the federal revenues paid by those States. Indeed, the South, by Lincoln’s time, had become nothing more than a politically impotent economic colony supplying endless revenues to the rest of the Union while being driven ever deeper into poverty.

It was Lincoln who embraced—and profited from—Hamilton’s “American System,” which today we call “crony capitalism” and which is really nothing other than the enemy of free enterprise, fascism. Lincoln was supported for the presidency by the economic interests of states such as Pennsylvania to which he promised a high tariff to protect their manufactured goods and a continuation of the flow of capital from the South to the North. Lincoln had been a lawyer with one of the railroads supported by such tax-funded largesse and was so successful that he was allowed to choose the eastern terminus for the contemplated trans-continental railroad. It is interesting—and revealing—to note that the property he chose for that site just happened to be owned by him! Lincoln’s sobriquet at that time—Honest Abe—was bestowed by his contemporaries for the same reason that the sobriquet “Little John” was bestowed upon Robin Hood’s very large lieutenant. In other words, it was a reference to behavior diametric to the appellation and therefore not a complement.

Finally, if you think that we had election fraud in 2008, Lincoln made use of the military to assure his re-election, something that was by no means guaranteed in November of 1864. General Benjamin (Beast) Butler was sent to New York from which he triumphantly informed Lincoln that no Democrats had been permitted to vote. The same happened in other states such as Ohio where both Lincoln and Lincoln’s war were not popular. Soldiers were permitted to vote in areas in which they did not live to assure his re-election. Meanwhile, their presence at the polls was a warning to those who might vote Democrat. In fact, in many instances the ballots were color-coded so that the party chosen by the voter was immediately obvious to those partisan “poll watchers” and many Americas were “discouraged” from voting if a wrong color ballot was observed.

There is so much more on Lincoln’s illegal, unconstitutional and immoral actions that is a part of the public record and yet, he continues to be revered, even worshipped, by people who despise and reject the things for which he stood and on which he acted. Even the popular belief that Lincoln “freed the slaves” or, in fact, had any feeling for them individually or as a group is nonsense, proven over and over by his own words and actions. He cared nothing for slavery and even less for “the African” and was willing to put slavery into the Constitution in the original 13th Amendment (Corwin) if it would keep the Southern states compliant.

Even the claim so often made that he fought the war to “preserve the union” is a lie though many Northerners were deceived and indeed fought for that stated purpose. First, a union is by its nature voluntary. Coercion at the point of a bayonet is nothing but conquest and occupation, not “union.” Then, Lincoln, his government and all of the states who fought ostensibly to preserve the Union were traitors according to Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution. Indeed, the only act defined as treason in that document is the waging of war against any of the signatory states and aiding and abetting in that war. If there was ever an act more worthy of the taint of treason and the openly guilty parties more exposed to public view, it has to be America’s “Civil War” in which the federal government—or should I say, the President—declared war on seven (later eleven) signatory states and initiated total war against them. Of course, all of those who supported or permitted this war were themselves traitors to a greater or lesser degree. It is ironic that the taint of treason was spread so liberally—and so successfully—on states that had acted constitutionally in attempting to remove themselves from a hostile and eventually murderous “union” while the actual traitors have been lauded to the skies historically as heroes and “true Americans.”

No, Mr. O’Reilly, your “stand” against those attempting to make of what remains of this nation another “Peoples’ Republic” cannot be believed so long as you refuse to acknowledge where America started to leave the path of Aristotle, Locke and the Founding Fathers and embrace the governing theories and actions of Hobbes and Marx. Actually, you have only two choices: understand and admit that “the nation’s greatest president” was a traitor and a murderer (over a million dead) and repudiate his “vision” for the nation—a federal tyranny—or cling to delusion, deception and myth and, by doing so, render your own message null and void and yourself foolish at best and dishonest at worst. You cannot have Lincoln and liberty.

Valerie Protopapas >

7 responses to “One Massachusetts Copperhead’s Views on the Civil Rights Record and Legacy of the Sixteenth President (Please Note: as a matter of family history more “Lincolns” fought for the CSA than the USA in 1861-65)

  1. I am a regular viewer of Bill O’Reilly’s and his obsession of Lincoln border’s on deification. One write wrote calling Lincoln a tyrant who imprisoned those dissented; the writer was told to ‘wise up’. That set me off, then I realized that O’Reilly specifically choose the last two months of Lincoln’s life to chronicle. In doing so he eliminated from the discussion all that Ms. Protopapas covered in her letter. When you so restrict the story you control the story thus control the myth.

    I, myself, have heard O’Reilly use the phase ‘killing his own people’ (a popular turn on Fox) when referring to the likes of Ahmadinejad, Mubarak, Gaddafi & Assad, but does not believe the phase apllies to Lincoln.

  2. Kudos to Valerie Protopapas for her well reason letter to Bill O’Reilly and his book on Lincoln. It appears that Bill really doesnt know much about Honest Abe and is just trying to cash in on the Sesquicentennial.

  3. It is not surprising that people know nothing of Lincoln than the deified version. Actually, Lincoln was being deified by the radical Republicans even as he lay dying. They hated the man in life, but like a current politician, they understood that no good crisis should be let go to waste. Sadly, by becoming a “martyr,” Lincoln was removed from objective oversight very much as was John F. Kennedy.

  4. In the case of Bill O’Reilly’s outrageous remarks and his position concerning Abraham Lincoln as being the “gold standard” for our Presidents by Lincoln rising to the occasion to save the United States and preserve the Union while abolishing Slavery during the American Civil War (1861-1865) makes me wonder what kind of ‘Kool-Aide’ is O’Reilly really drinking. Lincoln was responsible for an illegal war and for the premeditated genocide of his own southern countrymen. O’Reilly proudly boasted that he was a history major (expert) and had taught history. Really? To O’Reilly, “It is better to be thought a fool than to speak up and remove all doubt.” I, too think that O’Reilly is attempting to cash in with his new book, “Killing Lincoln” during the Sesquicentennial. To Lady Val, thanks so much for calling Bill O’Reilly out on this issue. If O’Reilly had any “fair and balanced” notion concerning this matter he would invite Valerie Protopapas on to his show.

  5. There’s a reason that Copperhead has an honorary citizenship of the Commonwealth of Virginia!! Deo Vindice Val…and to all those who seek truth…let the blinders come off, and their eyes be opened, before the great socialist experiment started in 1861 by lincoln, comes to an end.

  6. Not me! I am an ignoramus on this subject compared to others like Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo whose books on Lincoln have been unassailable despite every effort from establishment “historians.” But I have had people in various lists and blogs discount anything that I have said when DiLorenzo’s name comes up. They cannot disprove what he has written so they simply reject him. That’s why one cannot debate these people. Reality has no meaning for them. All that exists are their prejudices and they reject anything and everything that contradicts them.

  7. Confederate Papist

    I heard him on Beck’s show and I wanted to slap him through the radio. To Beck’s credit, he said Washington was the greatest POTUS and not Lincoln, but neither of them speak the truth of what Lincoln did to the people of the Confederacy and to the constitution.

    Valerie is living proof (along with Judge Andrew Napolitano) there are many Copperheads in Yankee-land!
    Deo Vindice!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s